Sometimes I Hate Being Right

By Tom Rhodes, 6/25/2020

News yesterday is "Hundreds ‘ambush’ Tampa police responding to report of shots fired, 2 officers injured, chief says" This is an example of the people of Tampa seeking justice by other means because because they have no legal remedy to the police abusing their rights.

I predicted this would happen back in 2014 and talked about why, noting the Ferguson Riots were the Early Signs of Revoluion.

I noted a couple years later in 2016 that Civil War II has started, it's a slow burn but it is ramping up and will unfortunately become a shooting war before another generation is born. I rightly stated, "As long as the minions of the elite maintain their quasi-military attitude, their us vs them mentality, and their legal unaccountably, they will increasingly find themselves at war against the American people. It is a war they cannot win."

That same article concluded "No sane person would celebrate the current situation, it has been predicted, but the repeated calls to hold the police and our government accountable have gone unheeded. When the FBI boldly proclaims that yes the elite did break the law, but we won’t prosecute, and cops routinely (hundreds of times a year) shoot the unarmed public without accountability, it clearly demonstrates to the people that the rule of law is dead, and the people cannot expect justice from the government. The people can, and will, seek justice through other means when the government refuses to enforce the rule of law."

I hope I'm wrong, but I predict that Civil War II will be bloodier and more deadly than the War Between the States.

Government Admits it was lying to us

Government Admits it was lying to us

All we can know for sure, whatever the govt tells you is not meant to be honest, it is meant to manipulate you

VIDEO - Fauci Admits Feds Initially Misled About Face Masks: ‘Wanted to Make Sure Health Care Workers’ Had Enough https://t.co/qO5G0G3arX

— Grabien (@GrabienMedia) June 17, 2020

Big Cities are Doomed

Prediction: The Ruins Detroit will be the model for all large Democrat run cities.  The most productive people in those cities have and are witnessing the inability of Democrat leaders to enforce the rule of law and protect them and their property.  The most productive will move out of places where they don't have protection from looters, or criminals, and the elected leaders are unwilling to enforce the laws protecting normal people.  This will hurt the poor in cities most.

No rational person will remain where they know real criminals can and do get away with looting, arson, etc. while they are overly taxed, and fined for even the most minor code violations, when they can live under the rule of law, with protection from criminals in other parts of the country.  You will also see the 'burbs and flyover country unwilling to support urban hell holes and fight back against taxes being sent to sustain them. 

Kung Flu Sicken has taught us the large office complex in the city is not needed, good people can be dispersed and don't need to be congregated to be productive. Cheaper to pay for an employees internet connection than provide them with an office. Big cities with Democrat leadership that are pandering to criminals are doomed.  Civil War II will be between urbanites and the rest of the country.  Who thought the dystopian fantasy Escape from New York would be a model of how to deal with urban hell holes.

Science says there multiple human "races" and culture is genetic too.

By Tom Rhodes 6/6/2020

From the article in the Huffington Post titled, "What Scientists Mean When They Say ‘Race’ Is Not Genetic", we read:

Genetic methods do not support the classification of humans into discrete races, [and] racial assumptions are not good biological guideposts. Races are not genetically homogeneous and lack clear-cut genetic boundaries. And because of this, using race as a proxy to make clinical predictions is about probability.

This is bullshit and not scientific. Let's use dogs as an example, and reword it that assertion using terms people associate with dogs.

Genetic methods do not support the classification of dogs into discrete breeds, [and] breed assumptions are not good biological guideposts. Breeds are not genetically homogeneous and lack clear-cut genetic boundaries. And because there are more mutts than purebreds, using breed as a proxy to make clinical predictions is about probability.

Absolutely absurd, when talking about different breeds of dogs, we can make good predictions not only on such clinical predictions as average age, size, speed, strength, susceptibility to certain disease, and so on, we can also make good predictions on temperament, intelligence, and behavior. Implying that race isn't a good indicator to make decisions because it is not a perfect predictor of those qualities, is like saying it's dumb to select a breed of dog because nobody can predict that dog's temperament etc.

All dogs are from the species called Canis lupus, a subspecies of wolf. The wolf, Canis lupus, has about 40 subspecies. Canis lupus familiaris. is the subspecies of wolf we call dogs. 

The races of man are simplistically referred to by color, white, black, yellow, some add brown and red.  The scientific fact is they are all subspecies of homo sapiens

Analysis of genomes from around the world establishes that there is a biological basis for race, despite the official statements to the contrary of leading social science organizations. An illustration of the point is the fact that with mixed race populations, such as African Americans, geneticists can now track along an individual’s genome, and assign each segment to an African or European ancestor, an exercise that would be impossible if race did not have some basis in biological reality.

Although it is not politically correct, the science is clear, although lots of people are mutts, that does not change the fact that the races of man genetically distinct, and we can observe and see measurable differences in not only color, but races are predictive  estimating average; size, speed, strength, IQ, temperament, behavior, immune systems, and even culture.

How evolution is active and observable in the human population even in recent history.  One could rationally conclude that the industrial revolution, was caused by evolution and a drive in accelerated evolution, and the reasons some races had it and others never did, are evolutionary driven by natural selection and environmental pressures.

The fact that Time Magazine published what is about as politically incorrect an article as you can read is amazing. About as non-PC as you can get, but rational, measurable and scientific. "New analyses of the human genome have established that human evolution has been recent, copious, and regional."

Read it and rationally not emotionally look at the evidence, and history is pretty clear. Not only are the races genetically distinct, but so are cultures.